Nalin Virji Shah And ORS v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

1/2 28-apl.1121.2018.doc nsc.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1121 OF 2018 Nalin Virji Shah and Ors.

...Applicants

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Anr

...Respondents

Mr.Vikram Sutaria i/b Mr.Niranjan Mundargi, for the Applicants. Mr.F.R.Shaikh, A.P.P. for the Respondent No.1 - State. Mr.Filji Frederick a/w Mr.Shubham Mittal and Ms.Prateeti Thakar, for the Respondent No.2.

CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ.

DATE : 8th JANUARY, 2019 P.C. :

1.

Perused the order dated 3rd December, 2018.

2.

Learned A.P.P. accordingly informs that though in relation to the present project there is no other grievance, in relation to other projects of Applicants, there is one complaint.

2/2 28-apl.1121.2018.doc 3.

Learned Counsel for the Applicants, upon instructions, states that the said complaint is also amicably settled. The Applicants appear to be Developer and Contractors in construction business only. 4.

In this situation, we find that joint request made by the parties can be accepted. Accordingly, we make Rule absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).

REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.