Kharghar Node Bahu Uddeshaya Samajik Sanstha v. City And Industrial Development Corporation Of Maharashtra Ltd.
mnm
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 12224 OF 2016 Kharghar Node Bahu Uddeshaya Samajik Sanstha
...Petitioner
Vs.
City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Limited & Ors.
...Respondents
Mr. Kunal Bhanage, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. Hemant Prabhulkar, Advocate for the respondents CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR & M.S. KARNIK, JJ.
DATED :24TH OCTOBER, 2016 P.C. :
Matter is not on board. In view of the urgency taken up in the production board.
2.
Parties through their Counsel. The grievance of the Petitioner is that though the Petitioner Association had applied for grant of temporary license for sale of fire-crackers on plot No.36, but without assigning any reasons instead of plot No.36 to the Association they have been allotted stall at
Plot No.12. Today when the matter has come up on board it has been prayed that this Court to dispose of this Petition by directing the Respondent to consider and take a fresh decision in regard to the Petitioner's prayer to allot temporary license for sale of fire-crackers on plot No.36.
3.
Learned Counsel appearing for Respondent submits that in fact all the Applicants have been granted temporary license for running temporary stall for sale of fire-crackers on plot No.12. Be that as it may. The application was for grant of temporary license for sale of fire-crackers on Plot No.36, it is the duty of the Respondent to inform the Petitioner as to why plot No.36 could not be granted for sale of fire-crackers on the basis of temporary license for sale of fire-crackers. 4.
Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner would appear before the Respondent tomorrow at 12 noon and shall make his submissions as to grant of license for sale of fire-crackers on Plot No.36. Learned Counsel for the Respondent submits as to grant of license for sale of fire-
crackers on plot No.36 to the Petitioner and/or the authorised representatives of the Petitioner would be heard and appropriate decision shall be taken as expeditiously as possible.
5.
In view of the aforesaid we dispose of this Petition by directing the Respondent to take appropriate decision by a speaking order within 2 days from the receipt of copy of this order.
6.
The Petition stands disposed of accordingly.
(M.S. KARNIK, J.) (SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.)