Chandrakant Baban Sathe v. The State Of Maharashtra

1/2 10.ABA.2999.2021.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.2999 OF 2021 Chandrakant Baban Sathe ..Applicant

Versus

State of Maharashtra ..Respondent WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.3000 OF 2021 Avinash Ramesh Khatanhar & Anr.

..Applicants

Versus

State of Maharashtra ..Respondent Mr. Miheer Gheewala a/w Adv. Aditya Mehta i/by Manoj Gadkari for the Applicants in both the ABAs Ms. Pallavi N. Dabholkar, APP for the Respondent-State. Mahadev Linge, PSI, Lonikand Police Station - present. CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.

DATED :

21st September, 2022 P.C.:

1.

Learned APP on instructions made a statement that applicants in both the applications have assisted investigation ofÏcer and have co-operated in the investigation of the case. 2.

It is further claimed that custodial interrogation of the applicants is not required considering the nature of allegations made.

3.

That being so, ad-interim protection stands confirmed. akn 1/2

2/2 10.ABA.2999.2021.doc 4.

The applicants shall attend the Investigating OfÏcer as and when directed.

5.

The applicants shall neither tamper with evidence nor influence the witnesses in any way.

6.

The both the applications stands disposed of. (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.) ANANT KRISHNA NAIK by ANANT KRISHNA NAIK Date: 2022.09.22 16:11:40 +0530 akn 2/2