Mrs. Shwetali Harshavardhan Hegde v. Mr. Harshavardhan Krishna Hegde

(913) CP-17-15.doc BDP-SPS Bharat D.

Pandit

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

by Bharat D.

Pandit Date:

2020.02.10 17:39:00 +0530 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.17 OF 2015 Shwetali Harshvardhan Hegde ..... Petitioner.

V/s Harshvardhan Krishna Hegde ..... Respondent.

Mr. Kushal Mor for the Petitioner.

CORAM: NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.

DATE: FEBRUARY 6, 2020 P.C.:- 1] Present contempt proceedings are arising out of non-compliance of the consent decree passed by the Family Court which includes one time alimony and transfer of immovable property. 2] In my opinion, consent decree is executable one and the Petitioner has every right in law to seek execution of such decree. That being so, contempt proceedings deserve to be disposed of with liberty to the Petitioner to take out execution proceedings based on the consent decree passed by the Family Court.

3] Needless to clarify that time consumed before this Court in pursuing contempt proceedings be taken into account in case if issue 1/2

(913) CP-17-15.doc of limitation crops up in execution proceedings. Let the executing court decide the execution proceedings expeditiously, if so taken out. 4] Contempt Petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. ( NITIN W. SAMBRE, J. ) 2/2