← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/4897/2019rule absolute

Abdul Kadar Hussain Badshah And ANR. v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR.

2020-02-14Hon'Ble Shri Justice N. R. Borkar,Hon'Ble Shri Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari2 pages

27-wp-4897.2019.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4897 OF 2019 Abdul Kadar Hussain Badshah and anr.

...

Petitioners

Versus

State of Maharashtra and Ors.

...

Respondents Mr.Kuldeep Patil for the petitioners.

Mr. Ranjit Patil for respondent no. 2.

Mr. Sooraj Hulke, APP for the respondent State. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & NITIN R. BORKAR, JJ.

DATE :

FEBRUARY 14, 2020 P.C.:

Petitioners are present with their advocate. Secretary of respondent no.2 is present with his advocate. Learned APP appears for the State.

2. Though the FIR as registered was under section 423, 441, 442, 445, 452, 453, 455, 463, 468 read with 34 and 120(B) IPC, ultimately after investigation respondent no.1 has presented chargesheet for the offences under sections 447, 453 and 455 IPC. The dispute has arisen out of possession of flat constructed for its members by respondent no. 2. 3.

The dispute has been amicably settled and respondent nilegaonkar 1/2

27-wp-4897.2019.odt no.2 has accordingly tendered affidavit today. Orally also respondent n.2 has given no objection. The dispute has no public angle. Therefore, accepting the joint request, we make the rule absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).

(NITIN R. BORKAR, J.) (B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.) nilegaonkar 2/2