Mr. Hilal Sada Patole And ANR. v. M/S. Pooja Sakshi Developers And Builders Through Its Proprietor And ORS.

902-aswp14611-18.doc vai

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELALTE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.14611 OF 2018 Hilal S. Patole & Anr.

...Petitioners

V/s.

Pooja Sakshi Developers & Builders & Ors.

...Respondents

Mr.V.V. Salunkhe I/b Mr.Prashant Marathe for the Petitioners. Mrs.M.P. Thakur, A.G.P. for the State.

CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & B.P. COLABAWALLA, JJ.

DATE : 15TH MARCH, 2019.

P.C. :- 1.

Heard Mr.Salunkhe, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. Perused the writ petition and the annexures thereto. The remedy to seek a relief in terms of prayer clause (a) is not a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioners have alternate and equally efficacious remedy which they can avail of by approaching an appropriate Forum / Court. Granting that liberty and upholding the preliminary objection to the maintainability of this writ petition, we dismiss this writ petition. There shall be no order as to costs.

(B.P. COLABAWALLA, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.) 1/1