← Library
Bombay High CourtFA/838/2015dismissed for noncomplying conditional order

Mr. Dak Jutia Nayak And Another v. The Union Of India Representative By The General Manager

2019-07-242 pages

42-fa-838-2015.doc FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO.838/2015 OfÏce Notes, OfÏce Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Advocate Mr.Mohan Rao a/w Pranav Dhakne a/w Pravin Mengane I/b Adv.Chetan Agrawal for Respondents. CORAM : K. K. TATED, J DATE : JULY 24, 2019.

P.C.:

Heard learned counsel for Respondents.

By this First Appeal, the Appellant/Claimant is challenging Judgment and Award dated 27.8.2014 passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal Mumbai in Claim Application No.O.A.(IIU)/MCC/2009/0892, dismissing appellant's application for compensation.

Considering the submissions made by learned Advocate for the Appellant and the grounds raised in First Appeal, I am satisfied that Appellant has made out a case for following Chitra Sonawane 1/2

42-fa-838-2015.doc order.

a) Admit.

b) Printing dispensed with.

c) The Appellant is directed to file private paper book within one year from today, with copy to other side failing which the First Appeal shall stand dismissed without further reference to the court.

d) Registry is directed to call the record and proceeding immediately.

e) Learned counsel Mr.Mohan Rao waives service for respondent.

f) Hearing of First appeal is expedited.

(K.K.TATED, J.) Chitra Sonawane 2/2