← Library
Bombay High CourtPIL/46/2013disposed off

Vasudev Ananta Bhoir v. The State Of Maharashtra, Through Urban Development Dept And ORS

2019-12-03Hon'Ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla,Hon'Ble Shri Justice S.C. Dharmadhikari3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.46 OF 2013 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.175 OF 2013 IN PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.46 OF 2013 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.122 OF 2015 IN PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.46 OF 2013 Vasudev Ananta Bhoir .... Petitioner Vs.

The State of Maharashtra & Others .... Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.6994 OF 2015 Sanjay Kashinath Desale .... Petitioner Vs.

The State of Maharashtra & Others .... Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.9229 OF 2013 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION [STAMP] NO.30573 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO.9229 OF 2013 Rajram Pandurang Lote .... Petitioner Vs.

Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority & Others .... Respondents Mr. Manish Pable, AGP, for the Respondent-State. Mr. G.B. Walawalkar i/by Mr. S.P. Thorat for Respondent No.4 in PIL-46/2013, for Respondent No.7 in WP-6994/2015 & for Respondent No.3 in WP-9229/2013.

Mr. R.M. Haridas with Mr. R.P. Lote for Respondent in WP-9229/2013.

Mr. D.S. Mhaispurkar with Mr. Sameer Mangaonkar for Respondent No.5 in WP-9229/2013.

CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & R.I. CHAGLA, JJ.

DATE : DECEMBER 03, 2019 P.C:

1.

After the order passed by this Court on the PIL and Writ Petition No.9229 of 2013 on 5-1-2015, the petitioners and the applicant have lost interest totally. All the more because the affidavits filed in the petitions attribute to the petitioners a specific role in the illegal and unauthorised activity of construction and development in village Davadi, Taluka and District Thane.

2.

We, therefore, dispose of this PIL and Writ Petition No.6994 of 2015, leaving the statutory authorities and their officials to resort to such provisions as are permissible in law to deal with the unauthorised construction activities within the Municipal limits.

3.

In view of disposal of the PIL, the civil applications preferred therein do not survive and they accordingly stand disposed of.

4.

As far as Writ Petition No.9229 of 2013 is concerned, the same is de-tagged from this group. It be listed as per its turn along with the civil application preferred therein. (R.I. CHAGLA, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.) by SURESH JAGDISH SAJNAWAT Date: 2019.12.07 10:56:48 +0530 SURESH JAGDISH SAJNAWAT