Anamika Ronald Cicil v. The State Of Maharashtra

(903)BA-2960-2022.doc rajshree

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.2960 OF 2022 Anamika Ronald Cicil ] ..

Applicant vs.

State of Maharashtra ] ..

Respondent Mr.Rushikesh Shinde a/w R.R. Mishra for the Applicant. Mr.S.H. Yadav, APP for the State.

PSI Pravin Sonawane and PI Argade present.

CORAM :

BHARATI DANGRE, J DATE :

20th OCTOBER, 2022.

P.C.

1] The learned APP states that the Investigating Officer intended to serve notice upon the Applicant under Section 41A of the Cr.P.C., however, she was not found on the address.

2] The learned counsel for the applicant states that the Applicant is residing at the address given in the title clause. 3] Let the notice be served upon the Applicant on the said address. Upon receipt of the notice, the Applicant shall report to the Investigating Officer within a period of 7 days from today. Upon her presence, the Investigating Officer shall follow procedure prescribed under Section 41A of the Cr.P.C. and record reasons in case if he comes at a 1/2

(903)BA-2960-2022.doc conclusion that custodial interrogation of the Applicants is very much necessary for completing the investigation. He shall also issue 72 hours notice in advance in case if he is desirous of effecting arrest. 4] With the above directions, Applications are disposed off. [BHARATI DANGRE, J] 2/2