Anil Shah And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

1-1-IA4354-2021INWP8834-21.DOC Santosh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 4354 OF 2021 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 8834 OF 2021 Anil G. Shah ...Applicant In the matter between Anil G. Shah

...Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & ors.

...Respondents

Mr. Amol Mhatre, for the Petitioner.

Mr. Anil G. Shah, Petitioner-in-person present. Mr. V. B. Kondedeshmukh, APP for the State/Respondent. SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Date: 2022.01.06 12:27:21 +0530

CORAM:

S. S. SHINDE & N. J. JAMADAR, JJ DATED:

5th JANUARY, 2022 (Through V. C.) PC:- 1.

Mr. Mhatre, the learned Counsel, submits that he has given no objection for the petitioner to appear in-person and submits that his appearance may be discharged. The statement is noted.

2.

Heard Mr. Anil Shah, the petitioner-in-person. 3.

This application is taken out by the petitioner to amend the petition. It is asserted that the petition was instituted prior to lock down. In the intervening period, there have been certain developments, which bear upon the issues raised in the petition. It is necessary to bring the subsequent 1/2

1-1-IA4354-2021INWP8834-21.DOC events on record.

4.

The petition is at pre-admission stage.

5.

The application for amendment deserves to be allowed. 6.

Hence, the interim application stands allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).

7.

Necessary amendment be carried out within a period of two weeks and amended copy of the petition be filed in the Registry.

8.

List the petition for admission on 25th January, 2022. [N. J. JAMADAR, J.] [S. S. SHINDE, J.] 2/2