Mohd Salim Mhod Ejaj Khan Pathan v. State Of Maharashtra

33.ba2190.16.sxw

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2190 OF 2016 Mohd. Salim Mhod Ejaj Khan Pathan.

... Applicant.

Versus

The State of Maharashtra.

... Respondent.

--- Mr. Swapnil Ovalekar, advocate for Applicant. Ms. J.S. Lohokare, APP for State.

Mr. Manir Fakir Sathe, PI, Kalyan Railway Police Station. --- CORAM : SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J DATE : FEBRUARY 6, 2017 P.C.:

Learned APP upon instructions submits that in the present case, substantive evidence of the complainant has been recorded. The learned Counsel for the applicant has put in the best of the efforts to espouse the cause of the applicant. Since trial has already progressed, the learned Sessions Judge seized with the Sessions Case No. 632 of 2015 is hereby requested to make endeavour to conclude recording of evidence as early as possible and not to grant unwarranted Talwalkar 1/2

33.ba2190.16.sxw adjournment to the prosecution and also ensure that the accused is produced before the court on each and every date. The professional fees are quantified at Rs. 1500/- to be paid to the learned Counsel for the applicant within 3 months from today. The application stands disposed of accordingly. (SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J) Talwalkar 2/2