Mumbai Bus Malak Sangathana Through Its Secretray v. Union Of India Through Its Secretary And ORS.

26.wp11443.17.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 11443 OF 2017 Mumbai Bus Malak Sangathana.

.. Petitioner.

v/s.

Union of India & ors.

.. Respondents.

Mr. S. S. Deokar, advocate for petitioner.

Mrs. M.P. Thakur, AGP for State.

Mr. Kunal Nawale a/w. Mr. A.D. Yadav I/b. Mr. R.V. Govilkar, advocate for respondent No. 1 Union.

CORAM : RANJIT MORE & SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, JJ.

DATE : APRIL 13, 2018.

P. C. :

Learned AGP at the outset placed on record the communication dated 30/12/2017 by Additional Transport Commissioner, Maharashtra State, Mumbai. The same is taken on record. In the light of the instructions given in the said communication, the learned Counsel for the petitioner fairly concedes that his grievance raised in the petition no more survives for consideration. He accordingly, seeks leave to withdraw the petition. Leave as prayed for is granted. Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. It is made clear that we have not gone into the merits of the matter. All points and contentions of the parties are kept open. [SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J.] [RANJIT MORE, J.] Talwalkar