Imran Latifkhan Tadvi And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra

41.ba-4202-21.doc Darshan Patil

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 4202 OF 2021

1) Imran Latifkhan Tadvi ..Applicants

2) Wasim Latifkhan Tadvi vs.

State of Maharashtra ..Respondent --- Mr. Raju D. Suryawanshi for applicants.

Mr. N.B. Patil, APP for respondent.

--- CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J.

DATE : NOVEMBER 29, 2022 P.C. :

1.

Heard learned counsel for the applicants.

2.

Learned counsel for the applicants seeks to withdraw the application. Since the applicants are in custody for more than three years, request is made for expedite the trial.

3.

No doubt, the pressure on the trial court is tremendous. The Trial Court is requested, if possible, to expedite the trial and preferably within a period of one year from today. If there is no progress made in the trial, the applicant is at liberty to apply for bail after one year. 1/2

41.ba-4202-21.doc 4.

Application is disposed of as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for.

(M. S. KARNIK, J.) 2/2