← Library
Bombay High CourtAPL/1066/2017others disposed off

Devesh S/O Suresh Sarda v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

2017-11-06Hon'Ble Shri Justice Ranjit More.,Hon'Ble Smt. Justice Dr. Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi3 pages

vks

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1066 OF 2017 Mr. Devesh Suresh Sarda ...

Applicant V/s.

The State of Maharashtra and ors ...

Respondents ALONGWITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.749 OF 2017 Mr. Ashish Suresh Sarda and anr ...

Applicants V/s.

The State of Maharashtra and ors ...

Respondents Ms. Kalyani Thakur, for the Applicants in both applications.

Mr. S. R. Shinde, APP for the Respondent State.

Mr. A. M. Udane, for respondent No.3.

CORAM : RANJIT MORE & DR.SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, JJ.

DATE : 6th NOVEMBER, 2017.

P.C. :

1] In both these applications, applicants are accused in C.R.No.72 of 2017, registered with Ojhar Police Station, District Nashik, at the instance of respondent No.3 Sudarshan Dilip Sarda, for 1/3

the offences punishable under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 of the Indian Penal Code.

2] The accused and complainant are the family members and pending investigation in F.I.R., with the intervention of elderly family members, they settled their dispute amicably and in pursuance of the understanding arrived at between them, they approached this Court, for quashing the subject crime by consent. Complainant -Respodent No.3 has filed separate affidavit in both these applications. In paragraph No.7, he has given no objection for quashing the said F.I.R. 3] It can, thus, be seen that the matters have been amicably settled between the parties. From the perusal of complaint, it transpires that the allegations are totally personal in nature. In these circumstances, and especially, in view of the law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Narinder Singh vs.

State of Punjab [2014 AIR SCW 2065], we are of the considered view that there is no impediment in quashing the subject F.I.R. However, at the same time, costs need to be saddled on the parties for using the police and judicial mechanism for settling their personal disputes.

of prayer clause (a), subject to payment of costs of Rs.5,000/- by each of the applicant in both these applications, to the "Tata Memorial Hospital" an institution that takes care of the advanced and terminally ill cancer patients. The applicants shall pay the said costs and produce the receipts thereof on the file of this Court within a period of four weeks from today, failing which, the applications shall stand dismissed automatically without further reference to the Court. 5] Subject to above, the petition stands disposed of. [DR.SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.] [RANJIT MORE, J.] 3/3