Dadasaheb Mahadeo Ingale v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS.

jdk 1 10a.cri.wp.4349.14.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 4349 OF 2014 Dadasaheb Mahadeo Ingale .. Petitioner Vs.

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

.. Respondents ....

Ms. Rohini Dandekar Advocate appointed for the Petitioner Mrs. A.S. Pai A.P.P. for the State ....

CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI AND SHRI. C.V. BHADANG, JJ.

DATE : MARCH 10, 2016 ORAL ORDER [PER SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] :

Heard both sides. Rule. By consent, rule is made returnable forthwith.

The petitioner has preferred an application for furlough. The said application came to be rejected. Being aggrieved thereby, the petitioner preferred an appeal against the said order of rejection. The appeal came to be dismissed. Hence, this petition.

jdk 2 10a.cri.wp.4349.14.doc The learned A.P.P. on instructions states that the petitioner has completed his sentence of imprisonment and he has been released from prison on 15.1.2016. In this view of the matter, the prayer of the petitioner does not survive for consideration. Hence, the petition is dismissed. Rule is discharged.

Fees be paid to the appointed advocate as per Rules. [ C.V.BHADANG, J.] [ SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. ] kandarkar