Anil Kashi Murarka v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

26.apl1153.18.doc .IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1153 OF 2018 Mr. Anil Kashi Murarka.

...Applicant.

Versus

State of Maharashtra & anr.

...Respondents.

Mr. Shrishail Sakhare a/w. Kamlesh Yadav, advocate for applicant.

Mr. Tejal Poyrekar, advocate for respondent No. 2. Dr. F.R. Shaikh, APP for State.

CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, JJ.

DATE : DECEMBER 4, 2019.

P.C.:

The parties have settled the controversies arising out of road accident amicably. The offences registered are under sections 324, 504 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Respondent No. 2 complainant has filed an affidavit accepting the settlement. The parties are present and orally reiterated their request. The petitioner has shown his readiness and willingness to compensate State Government by paying cost. In this situation, subject to petitioner paying to respondent No. 1 by depositing with Police Welfare Fund an Talwalkar

26.apl1153.18.doc amount of Rs. 10,000/- within four weeks from today, we make rule absolute in terms of prayer clause (b).

(SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J) (B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J) Talwalkar