Smt. Shaila Raju Khandagale v. Mangal D/O. Vishwanath Swami @ Mangal W/O Nitin Jangam

903 caw 2598.17.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2598 OF 2017 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 10119 OF 2017 Smt. Shaila Raju Khandagle ......Applicant/ Intervenor In the matter of :

Mangal D/o. Vishwanath Swami @ Mangal w/o. Nitin Jangam .....Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra and ors.

.....Respondents None for the applicant.

Mr. A. U. Patil, advocate for the petitioner. Mrs. M. P. Thakur, AGP for the State.

CORAM : RANJIT MORE & SMT.ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ.

DATE : 10th JANUARY, 2018.

P. C. :

The application is filed for intervention in the aforesaid petition. Though none appears for the applicant, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the applicant was heard before the caste scrutiny committee. In that view of the matter, we allow the applicant to intervene in the petition. The civil application is, accordingly, allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and is disposed off as such. 2.

The petitioner is directed to amend the cause-title of the petition and implead the applicant as party respondent and, thereafter, serve amended copy of the petition upon all concerned. Shubhada S Kadam 1/2

903 caw 2598.17.doc 3.

The Registry is, thereafter, directed to proceed further in the matter.

(SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.) [RANJIT MORE, J.] Shubhada S Kadam 2/2