Sangita Hemant Wade v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4393 OF 2014 Sangita Hement Wade.

..Petitioner.

Versus

State of Maharashtra & Others.

..Respondents.

Mr. D. B. Sonawane for the Petitioner.

Mr. K. V. Saste, learned APP for the State.

Coram : RANJIT MORE & SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ.

Date : January 15, 2015.

P. C. :

1.

The Petitioner has made a grievance that statement of the Petitioner is not being recorded by the woman police officer though the complaint/allegation is in respect of an offence punishable under section 354 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. Learned APP for the State having taken instructions from Ms. Ragini Ramchandra Waghmare, API, Boriwali Police Station, states that statement of the Petitioner would be recorded by the woman police officer only. Statement is accepted as undertaking to this Court. In the light of above statement, grievance of the Petitioner stands redressed. The Petitioner is at liberty to furnish the statement in writing, if she so desires.

2.

In the light of above, noting survives for consideration in the writ petition and it is accordingly disposed. [SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.] [RANJIT MORE, J.] patilsr 1 / 1