Harshad Balwant Kasbe v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION STAMP NO.28359 OF 2018 Harshad Balwant Kasbe ..Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others ..Respondents ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO.11470 OF 2018 Mrs. Parvin Shaukat Mulani ..Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others ..Respondents ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO.11471 OF 2018 Mr. Sanjay Sidram Bamane ..Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others ..Respondents ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO.11472 OF 2018 Mrs. Ujwalla Hanmant Shinde ..Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others ..Respondents ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO.11473 OF 2018 Darinath Mangeni Yedve ..Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others ..Respondents ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO.11474 OF 2018 BGP. 1 of 3
Vithal Indu Kartule ..Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others ..Respondents ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO.11475 OF 2018 Raghunath Bhimrao Pardhi ..Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others ..Respondents ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION STAMP NO.28390 OF 2018 Anant Vasant Bajantri ..Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others ..Respondents ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION STAMP NO.28380 OF 2018 Mrs. Samira Latif Jamdar ..Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others ..Respondents ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION STAMP NO.28363 OF 2018 Mrs. Vishakha Sagar Shethe ..Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others ..Respondents Mr. S. A. Rajeshirke, Advocate for the Petitioner in all the Petitions.
Ms. Kavita N. Solunke, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 & 2 - State. BGP. 2 of 3
CORAM : B. R. GAVAI & M. S. KARNIK, JJ.
DATE : 19th OCTOBER, 2018 ORAL JUDGMENT (B. R. Gavai, J) 1] Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard by consent of parties.
2] The limited relief claimed in the above Petitions is for a direction to the Respondent - Education Officer to decide the proposal for grant of approval to the appointment of the Petitioners. 3] The Respondent - Education Officer is directed to decide the proposal for grant of approval with regard to the appointment of the Petitioners as expeditiously as possible and in any case within a period of four weeks from today in the light of the judgment dated 10th July 2017 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.8587 of 2016 with connected Writ Petitions.
4] Rule is accordingly made absolute in the aforesaid terms.
[M. S. KARNIK, J.] [B. R. GAVAI, J.] BGP. 3 of 3