Pradip Malhari Salve v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS.

12 APPLN 545-18=.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 545 OF 2018 Pradip Malhari Salve ... Applicant V/s.

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

... Respondents Mr. Aniket Nikam for the Applicant.

Ms. M. R. Tidke, APP for the Respondent/State. Mr. Girish Agrawal for Respondent Nos. 2 to 5. CORAM: PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.

DATE : 08th JANUARY 2020 P.C.

1.

Heard learned Counsel for the Applicant and the learned Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 2 to 5.

2.

It seems that delay had occasioned as the Applicant could not make financial arrangement and also it took some time for seeking necessary legal advice. It is submitted that the Applicant has good case on merits.

3.

The learned Counsel for Respondent Nos. 2 to 5 objects the prayer.

4.

Having considered the reasons stated in the application Sneha Chavan 1/2

12 APPLN 545-18=.doc more particularly in paragraph 3 of the Applicants, the delay needs to be condoned and the matter needs to be admitted on merits. As such delay of 110 days is condoned. 5.

Application stands disposed of.

(PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN,J.) Sneha Chavan 2/2