Anita Ravi Papadkar v. Ravi Dattu Papadkar And ANR

3-REVN-67-2018.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 67 OF 2018 Anita Ravi Papadkar ...Applicant

Versus

Ravi Dattu Papadkar And Anr..

...Respondents

....

Ms. Smita Shirke, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. A. N. Shaikly, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Mr. Arfan Sait, APP for the Respondent - State. Ms. Anita Ravi Papadkar, Applicant Present in Court. Mr. Ravi Dattu Papadkar, Respondent No.1, Present in Court.

CORAM

:

PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.

DATE :

22nd JUNE, 2022.

PER COURT :

1.

Learned counsel for the applicant and Respondent No.1 jointly submitted that the parties have settled the dispute. They have executed the consent terms. In view of the consent terms, the applicant would withdraw this application. The consent terms are taken on record and marked as 'X' for identification. 2.

The revision applicant and Respondent No.1 are present in the Court. Consent terms stipulated that the amount of Rs.11,00,000/- towards the alimony would be deposited before the Court of Magistrate where the proceedings under the Domestic Violence Act are pending. The term is complied. by SAJAKALI LIYAKAT JAMADAR Date:

2022.06.23 10:53:20 +0530 Sajakali Jamadar SAJAKALI LIYAKAT JAMADAR

3-REVN-67-2018.doc 3.

In view of the aforesaid circumstances, the revision application is allowed to be withdrawn and stands disposed of accordingly.

4.

Advocate representing both the parties undertake to file Vakalatnama.

(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) Sajakali Jamadar