Anju Sanjay Khanna And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

2023:BHC-AS:38793 sg 901.wp14421-22.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.14421 OF 2022 Anju Sanjay Khanna And Anr.

...Petitioners

vs.

The State of Maharashtra & Others

...Respondents

....

Mr. Siddhesh Bhole, a/w. Ms. Anushree Koparkar, i/b. SSB Legal and Advisory, for the Petitioners.

Mr. P.P. Pujari, AGP, for Respondent State.

Mr. Saurabh More, for Respondent No.5.

Mrs. Praveen Khanna, present on V/C.

....

CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.

DATE : 19th DECEMBER 2023 P.C. :

1.

The learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioners and Respondent No.5 tender consent terms executed between the Petitioners and Respondent No.5.

2.

The consent terms are taken on record and marked "X" for identification.

3.

The Petitioners and Respondent No.5 are present through Video Conferencing. Their respective Counsels have identified their signatures.

1 / 2

sg 901.wp14421-22.doc 4.

Mr. Saurabh More, the learned Counsel, submits that he has instructions to appear on behalf of Respondent No.5 and undertakes to file the vakalatnama of Respondent No.5 within one week. 5.

Statements made in the consent terms are accepted as undertakings given to the Court.

6.

The writ petition is disposed of in view of the consent terms. (SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.) 2 / 2