Si Group India Private Limited v. The Hehsildar Rasal Sudhagad And ORS

suresh 906-CP-518.2017.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.518 OF 2017 IN WRIT PETITION NO.9918 OF 2016 SI Group India Private Limited .... Petitioner Vs.

The Tehsildar, Rasal - Sudhagad & Others .... Respondents Mr. S.V. Doijode with Ms Prakruti Joshi i/by Doijode Associates for the Petitioner.

Mr. B.V. Samant, AGP, for the Respondent-State. CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & SMT. BHARATI H. DANGRE, JJ.

DATE : JANUARY 25, 2018 P.C:

1.

Heard Mr. Doijode, appearing for the petitioner. Perused the petition and its annexures.

2.

It is fairly stated that later on there were orders passed in the writ petition and the civil writ petition itself came to be disposed of as a result of which the barbed wire fencing

suresh 906-CP-518.2017.doc was removed but by the petitioner. In the facts and circumstances of the present case and when the statutory authorities are also arrayed as respondents, we do not think that we should pursue the contempt petition. It is disposed of. (SMT. BHARATI H. DANGRE, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)