Vijaykumar Jagannath Nanavare v. Sunil Khanna And ORS

IRESH SIDDHARAM MASHAL Date: 2021.12.23 15:50:29 +0530 IRESH SIDDHARAM MASHAL 12.394.17 alp.doc ISM

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 394 OF 2017 VIJAYKUMAR JAGANNATH NANAVARE ....APPLICANT V/s.

SUNIL KHANNA AND ORS .....RESPONDENTS Mr. Vrindavan Patil i/b Samarth S. Karmarkar for the applicant Mr. Raghvendra Mehrotra for respondent no. 1 Ms. Sharmila S. Kaushik APP for the State CORAM :

NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.

DATE:

DECEMBER 22, 2021.

P.C.:

1] Heard.

2] In view of observations made in para 13 of the impugned order thereby acquitting the respondent-accused, the claim put forth by the counsel for the applicant that Magistrate has committed an error and should have recorded a finding of conviction is not appeared to be convincing.

3] The view expressed by the Magistrate is a possible view. That being so, leave stands refused. Application stands disposed of. [NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.] 1/1