Mr. Omprakash Nanak Benbanshi v. Mr. Rupnarayan Rajaram Chauhan Deceased Thr. Lrs. Smt. Haginadevi R. Chauhan And ORS.

1/2 29 CAF-4692-16.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

SALGAONKAR M M Date: 2022.04.20 17:41:32 +0530 SALGAONKAR M M CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4692 OF 2016 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4720 OF 2016 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO.30502 OF 2016 Omprakash Nanak Benbanshi ..

Applicant

Versus

Rupnarayan Rajaram Chauhan (deceased) through LRs Haginadevi R. Chauhan & Ors.

..

Respondents ...

Mr.Jagdish Kumar S. Hegde for the Applicant.

...

CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE, J.

DATED : 18th APRIL, 2022 P.C:- 1.

By Civil Application No.4692 of 2016, delay of 12 days is sought to be condoned. Notice was issued to the respondents and, accordingly, the learned counsel has tendered an affdavit of service on record, which indicate that the service has been effected on the respondents. The affdavit is taken on record. 2.

Heard the learned counsel for the applicants and perused the application, which seeks condonation of delay. M.M.Salgaonkar

2/2 29 CAF-4692-16.doc Paragraphs 4 and 5 justify the delay, which in my opinion, is bona fde and will not cause any prejudice, if condoned. The application is, therefore, allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). 3.

The Registry is directed to allot registration number to the First Appeal and list it after vacation alongwith the application for stay.

( SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.) M.M.Salgaonkar