Pritam @ Chandraprakash Yashwant Rajput v. The State Of Maharashtra

2_wp_4454_2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.4454 OF 2014 Pritam @ Chandraprakash Yashwant Rajput

...Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

Mr. Sachin Chandan for the Petitioner.

Mr. A.S. Shitole, A.P.P. for the Respondent -State. CORAM: SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI & SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ DATED: 29th March, 2016 ORAL ORDER [PER SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.]:

Heard both sides. Rule. By consent Rule is made returnable forthwith.

2.

In the year 2014 the Petitioner preferred an application for parole on the ground of illness of his mother. The said application came to be rejected on account of adverse police report. Being aggrieved thereby this petition has been preferred. 3.

In the police report it is stated that the illness of the Megha 1/2

2_wp_4454_2014 mother was not serious. According to the Petitioner false police report has been submitted by the police authorities. Hence, action may be taken against the Police Officers. It is the case of the Petitioner that whenever an application for parole is preferred false police report is submitted. Due to which his application for parole is rejected.

4.

The record shows that the Petitioner was released on parole on 24.12.2015. Thus, it is seen that there is no substance in the allegations of the Petitioner that false police report is submitted, due to which his application for parole is rejected. 5.

Looking to the fact that the Petitioner has been released on parole, this application is infructuous and is disposed of as such.

6.

Rule is discharged.

7.

Legal fees be paid to the appointed Advocate for the Petitioner as per rules.

(SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI,J.) (SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI,J.) Megha 2/2