Sadhana Ramdas Jagtap v. Gopinath N. Shenoy And ANR

spb/ 46appp752-759-760-761-14.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI. MISC. APPLICATION NO. 752 OF 2014 IN CRI. APPLICATION NO. 32 OF 2014 WITH CRI. MISC. APPLICATION NO. 759 OF 2014 IN CRI. APPLICATION NO. 33 OF 2014 Smt. Sadhna Ramdas Jagtap ...Applicant-in-person.

V/s.

Mr. Anand Utture & Anr.

... Respondents.

--- Mrs. Sadhana R.Jagtap, the Applicant, party-in-person. Mr. U. P. Warunjikar, Advocate for the Respondent. Smt. P.P. Bhosale, APP for the State.

--- WITH CRI. Misc. APPLICATION NO. 760 OF 2014 IN CRI. APPLICATION NO. 34 OF 2014 WITH CRI. MISC. APPLICATION NO. 761 OF 2014 IN CRI. APPLICATION NO. 35 OF 2014 Smt. Sadhna Ramdas Jagtap ...Applicant-in-person.

V/s.

Gopinath N. Shenoy & Anr.

... Respondents.

--- Mrs. Sadhana R.Jagtap, the Applicant, party-in-person. Mr. U. P. Warunjikar, Advocate for the Respondent. Smt. P.P. Bhosale, APP for the State.

--- Borey 1/2

spb/ 46appp752-759-760-761-14.doc CORAM : M.L.TAHALIYANI, J.

DATE : 05 JANUARY, 2015 P.C. :

Heard the Applicant, party-in-person.

The order passed by this court is a reasoned order. There is no scope of reviewing the said order. Applications stand rejected.

(JUDGE) .....

Borey 2/2