Rahil Rizwan Shaikh v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR.

23.WP.4428.2018.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.4428 OF 2018 Rahil Rizwan Shaikh Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra and another Respondents Mr.Mohammad Juned h/for Adv.Ruby Shaikh, Advocate for Petitioner.

Adv.Morgan Mendonca, Advocate for Respondent no.2. Mr.S.S.Hulke, APP, for State.

CORAM : A.S.GADKARI AND PRAKASH D.NAIK, JJ.

DATE : 27th March 2023 PC :

1.

Advocate Mr.Mohammad Juned seeks time on the ground that Advocate for Petitioner is in personal difficulty. Record indicates that even on earlier occasion i.e. 27th February 2023 time was sought by advocate of Petitioner despite circulating the said petition on that day.

It appears that, Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the petition.

2.

Petition is dismissed for non prosecution.

MANISH SURESH THATTE by MANISH SURESH THATTE Date: 2023.04.03 09:36:57 +0530 (PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) (A.S.GADKARI, J.) MST