Shrikant Siddharth Jadhav v. The State Of Maharashtra

ba.2453.17.16.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2453 OF 2017 Shrikant Siddharth Jadhav ...Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

Mr. Rajendra M. Narvankar for the Applicant Mr. A. A. Palkar, A.P.P for the Respondent-State PSI Mr. Nitin Shankarrao Sonkamble from Mankhurd Police Station is present CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

TUESDAY, 3 rd APRIL, 2018 P.C. :

1.

At the outset, learned A.P.P, on instructions, states that the charge has been framed and the trial has commenced, inasmuch as, the first witness is in the witness box facing cross-examination. 2.

In view of the aforesaid, learned counsel for the applicant does not press this application and seeks leave to withdraw the same. He, however, prays that the trial be expedited.

SQ Pathan 1/2

ba.2453.17.16.doc 3.

Accordingly, the application is disposed of as withdrawn. Since the trial has already commenced, the trial of the applicant is expedited.

REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

SQ Pathan 2/2