Pankaj Vittal Gaware v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS.

1. cri wp 4514-14.doc RMA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 4514 OF 2014 Pankaj Vittal Gaware ..

Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

..

Respondents ...................

Appearances Ms. Heena Suvarnakar i/by Mr. Kuldeep S. Patil Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. Arfan Sait APP for the State ...................

CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI & MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.

DATE : DECEMBER 21, 2016.

ORAL JUDGMENT [PER SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.] : 1.

Heard both sides.

2.

Rule. By consent, Rule is made returnable forthwith. 3.

The petitioner has prayed for extension of parole as he had overstayed parole. On account of overstay, his remissions were cut.

jfoanz vkacsjdj 1 of 2

1. cri wp 4514-14.doc 4.

Learned APP states on instructions that the petitioner has been released from prison after completing his period of imprisonment. In this view of the matter, the petition has become infructuous, hence, Rule is discharged. [ MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J ] [ SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. ] jfoanz vkacsjdj 2 of 2