Yasin Dastagir Sutar v. The State Of Maharashtra

1/2 8 Wp 4437-17.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4437 OF 2017 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 146 of 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4437 OF 2017 Yasin Dastagir Sutar .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra .. Respondents ...

None for the petitioner.

Mr.F.R. Shaikh, APP for the State.

CORAM: SHRI RANJIT MORE & SMT. BHARATI H.DANGRE, JJ.

DATED : 9th JULY 2019 P.C:- Heard learned APP for the State.

The petitioner, who has filed this petition through Jail, make a grievance that he is not being produced on the dates of hearing for want of guards.

Mr.Shaikh, learned APP, on instructions, makes a statement that the petitioner would be produced in the Court whenever his presence is required and the absence of the Tilak

2/2 8 Wp 4437-17.doc availability of the guards would not be made an excuse for nonproduction of the accused. Statement accepted. In the light of above statement, grievance raised in the petition no more survives.

Petition is disposed of accordingly.

In view of disposal of Writ Petition, Civil Application No.146 of 2018 does not survive and is disposed of accordingly. (SMT. BHARATI H. DANGRE, J.) (RANJIT MORE, J.) Tilak