← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/5269/2019rule absolute

Siddharth Gangadharan Karanchery And ORS. v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS.

2020-01-22Hon'Ble Shri Justice N. R. Borkar,Hon'Ble Shri Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari2 pages

55-wp-5269.2019a.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 5269 OF 2019 Siddharth Gangadharan Karanchery and Ors...

Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Ors.

... Respondents Adv Ridhi Thakkar for the petitioners.

Adv Gauri Joglekar i/by Madhuri Sharma for respondent no. 3. Mr. S.R. Shinde, APP for the respondent State. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & NITIN R. BORKAR, JJ.

DATE :

JANUARY 22, 2020 P.C.:

Parties are present with their respective advocates. Learned APP appears for respondent nos.1 and 2.

2.

The matrimonial discord between Respondent no. 3 on the one hand and other petitioners on the other hand is amicably resolved and the consent terms have been already recorded by the Family Court In MJ Petition No. A-2180/2018. The same were also recorded by the Metropolitan Magistrate, Andheri in Criminal Case No. 268/DV/2018.

3.

In the affidavit tendered today, respondent no.3 has again given her no objection and also stated that she agrees to the nilegaonkar 1/2

55-wp-5269.2019a.odt consent terms. The amount to be paid to respondent no. 3 is already deposited with the Family Court.

4.

In view of these developments and the joint request made, we make the rule absolute in terms of prayer clause (d). (NITIN R. BORKAR, J.) (B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.) *Corrected as per speaking to minutes of order dated 18/02/2020. nilegaonkar 2/2