Supdu Ahmed Tadvi v. The State Of Maharashtra

16. cri wp 4029-13.doc RMA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 4029 OF 2013 Supdu Ahmed Tadvi ..

Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra ..

Respondent ...................

Appearances Mrs. Indrayani M. Koparkar Advocate (appointed) for the Petitioner Mrs. U.V. Kejriwal APP for the State ...................

CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI & MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.

DATE : JUNE 20, 2016.

ORAL ORDER [PER SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.] :

1.

Heard both sides.

2.

Rule. By consent, Rule is made returnable forthwith. 3.

The petition is praying for furlough. Learned APP, on instructions from Shri. Kashinath Pandurang Kenjale, Jailer of Nasik Road Central Prison, states that the petitioner has completed his sentence of imprisonment and he has been jfoanz vkacsjdj 1 of 2

16. cri wp 4029-13.doc released from prison. In this view of the matter, nothing survives in this petition, hence, rule is discharged. [ MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J ] [ SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. ] jfoanz vkacsjdj 2 of 2