Nanasaheb Ganpat Kashid v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR.

908 & 909 wp 4458 & 4459.18.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4458 OF 2018 Sou. Minakshi Babasaheb Kashid and anr.

.....Petitioners versus The State of Maharashtra and anr.

......Respondents with WRIT PETITION NO.4459 OF 2018 Nanasaheb Ganpat Kashid .....Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra and anr.

......Respondents Mr. Priyal G. Sarda, advocate for the petitioners. Mrs. Aruna S. Pai, APP for the State.

CORAM : RANJIT MORE & SMT.BHARATI H. DANGRE, JJ.

DATE : 30th OCTOBER, 2018.

P. C. :

Mrs. Pai, learned APP, has placed on record a report of the Tahsildar, Barshi, dated 29th October, 2018. The report discloses that the subject vehicles are released and the possession of the same is given to the respective owners. The report of the Police Station, Vairag and the receipts of the vehicle owners are attached to the said report. 2.

In the light of the above report, the grievance raised in the petitions, no more survives. The petitions are, accordingly, disposed of. [SMT.BHARATI H. DANGRE, J.] [RANJIT MORE, J.] Shubhada S Kadam 1/1