← Library
Bombay High CourtAPEAL/893/2017others disposed off

M/S. Mayur Tempo (Sole Proprietor Eknath Laxmanrao Mahamulkar v. M/S. Sonali Engineering Works Through Prop Mahadev Vishnu Shelar And ANR

2017-11-01Hon'Ble Smt. Justice Anuja Prabhudessai3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.893 OF 2017 M/s. Mayur Tempo (Sole Proprietor Eknath Laxmanrao Mahamulkar) ...Appellant

Versus

M/s. Sonal Engineering Works (Proprietor Mahadev Vishnu Shelar) & Anr.

...Respondents

.....

Mr. Bhupesh V. Samant for the Appellant.

Mr. P.S. Gole for the Respondent No.1.

Mrs. N.S. Jain, APP for the Respondent No.2-State. CORAM : SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.

DATED : 1st NOVEMBER, 2017.

P.C.:- Not on board. Taken on board.

2.

Heard the learned counsels for the respective parties. With consent of both the parties matter is taken up for final hearing. 3.

The Appellant herein was a complainant in S.C.C. No. 2077 of 2014 filed before the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Satara for offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable 1/3

Instruments Act. The learned Magistrate had recorded verification statement on 29 th February, 2016 and issued process by order dated 9 th March, 2016. It appears that the complainant had remained absent from 7 th July, 2016 and had also failed to take steps to serve the Respondent-accused. The learned Magistrate therefore dismissed the complaint for non prosecution and acquitted the accused. 4.

The Appellant has stated that he was under the impression that his Advocate would pursue the matter since it was only for service of summons. It is stated that Advocate for the Appellant could not attend the hearing as he was suffering from Typhoid. 5.

Considering the above facts and circumstances in my considered view the order of dismissal needs to be quashed and set aside. Hence, the following order:- (a) Appeal is allowed with cost of Rs.10,000/- to be paid to the Respondent.

(b) The impugned order dated 10 th November, 2016 is quashed and set aside and Criminal Case No.2077 of 2014 is restored to file.

(c) Both parties agree to appear before the Trial 2/3

Court on 20th November, 2017 at 11.00 a.m.

6.

All concerned to act on an authenticated copy of this order. (ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.) 3/3