Ravindra Shankar Veer v. The State Of Maharashtra
2-ABA-2310-2019.doc Shailaja
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.2310 OF 2019 Ravindra Shankar Veer ] Applicant Vs.
State of Maharashtra ] Respondent a/w INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1706 OF 2019 Baby Dattatray Gole ] Applicant
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN:
Ravindra Shankar Veer ] Applicant Vs.
State of Maharashtra ] Respondent .....
Mr. Sanjeev Kadam a/w Mr. Nitin Dhumal, for Applicant. Mr. H.J. Dedhia, A.P.P, for Respondent-State. Mr. Nikhil Magdum, P.S.I, Rajgad Police Station, Pune. ....
CORAM: PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.
DATE: 20th NOVEMBER, 2021.
P.C.
By an order dated 18th October, 2019, interim protection was granted to the applicant in C.R. No.315 of 2019 registered with Rajgad Police Station under sections 304, 354, 324, 504 and 506 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
1/2 SHAILAJA SHRIKANT HALKUDE SHRIKANT HALKUDE Date: 2021.11.23 10:50:20 +0530
2-ABA-2310-2019.doc 2.
Heard Mr. Kadam, learned Counsel for the applicant and Mr. Dedhia, learned A.P.P, for respondent-State.
3.
Mr. Dedhia, learned A.P.P submits that the applicant has been attending the concerned Police Station as directed by this Court by an order dated 18th October, 2019. On 30th October, 2021, Mr. Palkar, the learned A.P.P who was then present made a statement, on instructions, from one Mr. Jadhav Police Naik, Rajgadh Police Station that the charge-sheet will be filed within one week. Again, as usual, the statement is not adhered to and no charge-sheet has been filed till date.
4.
Mr. Dedhia, learned A.P.P also makes a statement, on instructions, that custodial interrogation of the applicant is not required.
5.
For all these reasons, ad-interim relief is confirmed. However, the applicant shall continue to co-operate with the Investigating Officer as and when called.
6.
Application stand disposed of.
7.
In view of disposal of the application, interim application, stand disposed of.
[PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.] 2/2