Santosh Maruti Gurav And ANR v. Vijay Neminath Sangave And ORS

73.caw.233.14.correct.sxw ingale

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 233 OF 2014 IN REVIEW PETITION STAMP NO. 31851 OF 2013 Shri Santosh Maruti Gurav and another .. Applicants Vs.

Vijay Neminath Sangave and others .. Respondents Mr. Surel S.Shah,Advocate for the Applicants. Mr.G.M.Savagave, Advocate for the Respondent No.1. Mr.Chetan G.Patil, Advocate for Respondents No. 2 & 3. CORAM :

R. G. KETKAR, J.

DATE : 20th MARCH, 2015 P.C. :

.

Heard Mr.Surel S.Shah, learned Counsel for the applicants, Mr.G.M.Savagave, learned Counsel for respondent No.1 and Mr.Chetan G.Patil, learned Counsel for respondents No. 2 & 3. 2.

This is an application for condonation of delay of 1 year and 1 month in filing the Review Petition. Mr.Patil submits that respondents No.2 & 3 do not admit correctness of the assertions made in paragraphs 3 & 7 of the application.

3.

For the reasons stated in the application, I am satisfied that applicants have made out a sufficient cause for condoning the delay. Hence, Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (A) with nor order as to costs.

4.

List the Review Petition for admission on 10/04/2015. (R. G. KETKAR, J.) 1/1