Pranav Arvind Mehta v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

V.A. Tikam 2- WP 3569 -3556 of 2023.doc VAISHALI ANIL TIKAM

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION by VAISHALI ANIL TIKAM Date:

2023.11.09 09:47:21 +0530 WRIT PETITION NO.3569 OF 2023 Pranav Arvind Mehta .. Petitioner vs.

The State of Maharashtra and Anr.

.. Respondents WRIT PETITION NO.3556 OF 2023 Jasmeet Singh Anand .. Petitioner vs.

The State of Maharashtra and Anr.

.. Respondents Mr. Abdul Bari Khan for the Petitioner in both the Petitions Ms.Mahalakshmi Ganpathy, APP for Respondent No.1 State Mr. Saif Mobhani for Respondent No.2 in both the Petitions CORAM: A. S. GADKARI AND SHYAM C. CHANDAK, JJ.

DATE : 4th NOVEMBER, 2023.

P. C.:- 1) Heard learned Advocate for the Petitioners, learned APP for the State and the learned Advocate for Respondent No.2. Perused record of investigation of present crime.

2) The record indicates that there is one more victim of the present crime namely Smt. Tabassum Danish Shaikh, who also alleges to have been duped by the Petitioners, by adopting same modus operandi as used with Respondent No.2.

1/1

V.A. Tikam 2- WP 3569 -3556 of 2023.doc 3) In view thereof and after hearing the learned Advocate for the Petitioners, when this Court was not inclined to grant any relief as prayed for, learned Advocate on instructions seeks leave to withdraw the Petition with liberty to file an application for discharge before the trial Court, if the police submits charge-sheet in the case.

Leave and liberty granted.

4) Disposed off as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. (SHYAM C. CHANDAK,J.) (A. S. GADKARI, J.) 2/1