Dr. Naresh Rangraoji Raut v. State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And ORS

ssm 1 1­rpw149.15.sxw

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO. 149 OF 2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 8711 OF 2015 Dr. Chandrakant B. Dixit ....Petitioner.

Vs.

State of Maharashtra & Ors.

....Respondents.

WITH REVIEW PETITION NO. 150 OF 2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 11371 OF 2015 Dr. Naresh Rangraoji Raut ....Petitioner.

Vs.

State of Maharashtra & Ors.

....Respondents.

WITH REVIEW PETITION NO. 151 OF 2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 11372 OF 2015 Dr. Dnanaba Baliram Range ....Petitioner.

Vs.

State of Maharashtra & Ors.

....Respondents.

WITH REVIEW PETITION NO. 152 OF 2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 10315 OF 2015 Dr. Ganesh Pundalik Nichat ....Petitioner.

Vs.

State of Maharashtra & Ors.

....Respondents.

1/2

ssm 2 1­rpw149.15.sxw Mr. Bhushan C. Joshi for the Petitioner in all the matters. Mr. S.P. Thorat for Respondent Nos. 2 to 4 in all matters. CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA AND A.A. SAYED, JJ.

DATE : 27 NOVEMBER 2017.

(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER:­ Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. No case is made out for the review as there is no error apparent on face of the record. Even otherwise, the learned counsel appearing for the Respondent­Zilla Parishad, Thane, makes a statement that in pursuance to the order passed by this Court, the Zilla Parishad, has already heard the Petitioners and passed orders. The Petitioners would be at liberty to invoke appropriate remedy available to them in law, upon being served with the orders of the Zilla Parishad.

All the Review Petitions are disposed of accordingly. No costs.

(A.A. SAYED, J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) 2/2