Pinky Santosh Wadhwa And ANR. v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR.

1 / 2 11-IA-4486-&-4489-22.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.4486 OF 2022 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (ST) NO.19140 OF 2022 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.4489 OF 2022 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (ST) NO.19140 OF 2022 WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (ST) NO.19140 OF 2022 Pinky Santosh Wadhwa & Anr.

.... Applicants versus State of Maharashtra & Anr.

.... Respondents .......

• Mr. S. B. Rao i/b. Gauri S. Rao, Advocate for Applicants. • Mr. Arfan Sait, APP for the State/Respondent. • Mr. Pawan Mali, Advocate for Respondent No.2.

CORAM

: SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.

DATE : 20th JUNE, 2023 P.C. :

1.

Learned counsel for the Applicant does not press this application as the trial has progressed further. His only anxiety is that the question of jurisdiction of the trial Court is required to be decided during the trial. The request is reasonable. Therefore, Nesarikar

2 / 2 11-IA-4486-&-4489-22.odt the Revision Application along with both the Interim Applications are allowed to be withdrawn.

2.

The question raised by about the jurisdiction of the trial Court and all other points raised in this Revision Application are left open. It is made clear that the Court has not made any observations regarding the rival submissions of learned counsel for both the contesting parties. The trial shall be decided in accordance with law.

3.

Revision Application and the Interim Applications are disposed of.

(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)