Rocky @ Ajay Atul Patil v. The State Of Maharashtra

8. wp 4529.17.doc Urmila Ingale

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 4529 OF 2017 Rocky @ Ajay Atul Patil .. Petitioner Vs.

The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Ms.Rohini M. Dandekar, for the Petitioner.

Mr.Arfan Sait, APP for State.

CORAM : SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI ACTING C.J.

AND M.S.KARNIK, J.

19th JANUARY, 2018 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER SMT.

V.K.TAHILRAMANI ACTING C.J.) :

1.

Heard both sides.

2.

The case of the petitioner is that he preferred an application for furlough. However, the authority did not process his application and decide it. Learned APP stated that the said application will be processed in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible. In view of the statement, nothing further survives in this Petition. Rule is discharged. (M.S.KARNIK, J.) (ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) 1/1