← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/3964/2016others disposed off

Parveen Aslam Khan v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

2018-10-05Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari2 pages

ssm 1 27-wp3964.16.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3964 OF 2016 Parveen Aslam Khan ....Petitioner.

Vs.

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

....Respondents.

Mr. Sandeep K. Kadam I/by Sushant Narkar for the Petitioner. Mr. A.R. Patil APP, for the Respondent-State. Mr. H.S. Venegaonkar for Respondent No.2.

CORAM : A. S. GADKARI, J.

DATE : 5th OCTOBER, 2018.

P.C.:- By the present Petition, the Petitioner has impugned Orders dated 8th October, 2016 and 7th November 2016 passed by the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, 3rd Court, Esplanade, Mumbai, thereby issuing non-bailable warrant and rejecting the Application of the Petitioner for cancellation of the said non-bailable warrant under Section 70(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

The record indicates that, as the Petitioner remained absent on various occasions before the Trial Court in the proceedings pending before it, the learned Trial Court was constrained to issue 1/2

ssm 2 27-wp3964.16.doc non-bailable warrant against the Petitioner.

The learned counsel for the Petitioner submitted that, there are family problems which are being faced by the Petitioner and that is the reason, the Petitioner remained absent on certain occasions before the Trial Court. He further, on instructions, submitted that, hereinafter the Petitioner will attend all the dates before the Trial Court and will not seek any adjournment on any count. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the Petitioner, the impugned Orders dated 8th October, 2016 and 7th November, 2016 passed by the Trial Court are hereby quashed and set aside subject to condition that, the Petitioner shall pay a cost of Rs.5,000/- to the High Court Legal Aid Committee within a period of three weeks from today.

It is made clear that, the payment of costs within stipulated period shall be condition precedent for setting aside the said impugned Orders.

Petition is allowed in the aforesaid terms.

(A.S. GADKARI, J.) 2/2