M C Thomas v. State Of Maharashtra Thr The Principal Secretary Dept Of Skill Development And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 20388 OF 2022 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4245 OF 2021 Mr. M.C. Thomas ...Applicant.

In the matter between:

Mr. M.C. Thomas

...Petitioner.

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Others.

..Respondents.

------ Mr. T.R. Yadav, for the Applicant.

Mr. Vaibhav Sugdare, Special Counsel with Smt. A.A. Purav, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 4-State.

Mr. Amitkumar Sale for Respondent Nos.5 & 6.

------ CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE & SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, JJ.

Date : December 8, 2022.

P. C. :

1.

Though prayer for amendment is resisted by the special counsel for the Respondent-Government, having regard to the nature of amendment sought, in the interest of justice, interim application stands allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Appropriate amendment be carried out within four weeks from today. Fresh verification is dispensed with. by SACHIN RAMCHANDRA PATIL Date:

2022.12.12 10:48:10 +0530 patil_sr 1 / 2 SACHIN RAMCHANDRA PATIL

2.

If the amendment is so carried, the Respondent shall be at liberty to file reply within four weeks thereafter. If the amendment is not carried out, the interim application shall stand rejected without further reference to the Court. [Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.] [Nitin W. Sambre, J.] patil_sr 2 / 2