Mamata Katariya And ANR. v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR.

30.wp5467.19.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 5467 OF 2019 Mamata Katariya & anr.

...Petitioners.

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & anr.

...Respondents

Ms. Falguni Brahmbhath, Ms. Devashree Pandit, Ms. Rukhsar Ansari, advocate for the Petitioners.

Smt. S.D. Shinde, APP for State.

CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, JJ.

DATE : NOVEMBER 28, 2019.

P.C.:

Petitioners are present with their advocate. Respondent No. 2 is present with her advocate. Learned APP present for respondent No. 1.

Parties are jointly requesting for quashing of FIR. The petitioners have in court handed over demand draft for Rs. 1,55,000/- to respondent No. 2 which respondent No. 2 has received.

Consent Terms and affidavit are also tendered in court.

Talwalkar

30.wp5467.19.doc Prima facie it appears that after the commercial transaction failed, police complaint was filed. However, we need not go into its nicety.

As parties have settled the controversy, we accept their joint request and make rule absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).

(SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J) (B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J) Talwalkar