Kumar Pradhan And ANR v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR

P12-CAW3180-15.DOC Shephali

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3180 OF 2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 8409 OF 2014 Kumar Pradhan & Satish Pradhan

...Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

...Respondents

Ms. Bhagyashri Gawas, i/b Mr. C.K. Tripathi, for the Petitioners/ Applicants.

Mrs. M.P. Thakur, AGP, for Respondent No. 1.

Mr. Akshay Kulkarni, i/b Mr. A.M. Kulkarni, for Respondent No. 2.

CORAM: A. S. OKA & G.S. PATEL, JJ.

DATED:

3rd December 2015 PC:- 1.

Not on board. Taken on board.

2.

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the Applicants, learned AGP for the Respondent No. 1 and the learned counsel appearing for the Respondent No. 2. In view of the averments made in paragraph Nos. 3 and 4, a case for restoration is made out.

P12-CAW3180-15.DOC 3.

Accordingly, the Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b).

4.

As both the Respondents in the main Petition are represented, place the Writ Petition on board as per the C.M.I.S. date.

(G. S. PATEL, J.) (A. S. OKA, J.)