Vandana Sunil Pawar v. The State Of Maharashtra

ssm 1 49-ba1803.17gp.sxw

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1803 OF 2017 Rahul @ Raosaheb Vinayak Patil ....Applicant.

Vs.

State of Maharashtra ....Respondent.

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1022 OF 2017 IN BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1803 OF 2017 Mrs. Vandana Sunil Pawar ....Applicant.

IN THE MATTER BETWEENRahul @ Raosaheb Vinayak Patil

....Applicant.

Vs.

State of Maharashtra ....Respondent.

Ms. Anjali Patil a/w Mr. Arun Rajput for the Applicant. Smt. Rutuja Ambekar APP, for the Respondent-State. Mr. J.S. Yadav, for the Intervenor.

CORAM : A. S. GADKARI, J.

DATE : 13th JUNE, 2018.

P.C.:- Heard the learned counsel for the Applicant, the learned counsel for the first informant and the learned APP. After hearing the learned counsel for the Applicant and after perusing the record, when this Court was not inclined to grant any relief, the learned counsel for the Applicant, on instructions, seeks 1/2

ssm 2 49-ba1803.17gp.sxw leave to withdraw the present Application with liberty to file a fresh Application for bail before the Trial Court, if the trial arising out of C.R. No.I-335 of 2016, registered with Khadakpada Police Station, now culminated into Atrocity Special Case No. 6 of 2017, does not commence within a period of six months from today. Leave and liberty granted.

Application is dismissed as withdrawn, with aforesaid liberty.

In view of the dismissal of the Bail Application No. 1803 of 2017, nothing survives in the Intervention Application No. 1022 of 2017 and the same is also disposed of.

(A.S. GADKARI, J.) 2/2