Bajrang Nandlal Goenka And ORS. v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR.

1 / 2 924-WP-4885-18.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.4885 OF 2018 Bajrang Nandlal Goenka & Ors.

.... Petitioners versus State of Maharashtra & Anr.

... Respondents .......

• Mr.Amey Deshpande, Advocate for Petitioners.

• Ms.Sandhya Mailagir i/b. Anil D. Joshi, Advocate for Respondent No.2.

• Mr.S.R. Shinde, APP for Respondent/State.

CORAM : B. P. DHARMADHIKARI & SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.

DATE : 29th NOVEMBER, 2018.

P.C. :

1.

Petitioners are present with their Advocate. Respondent No.2 is present with her Advocate and Mr.Sanjay Soni.

2.

Learned APP appears for Respondent No.1.

Nesarikar

2 / 2 924-WP-4885-18.odt 3.

Respondent No.2 and Applicant jointly requests for quashing of FIR No.378/18. The FIR is u/s 365, 324, 323, 504, 506, 143, 147 and 149 of Indian Penal Code.

4.

We have enquired from Respondent No.2. He submits that he was beaten up and he had filed complaint because he was concerned with Mr.Sanjay Soni. Mr. Sanjay Soni is also present in Court with him. Respondent No.2 has tendered an affidavit and submitted that FIR should be quashed and set aside.

5.

We find that Mr.Sanjay Soni was in employment of Petitioner No.1 and out of that employment the dispute arose. There is no public angle to it.

6.

In this situation, accepting joint request, we make Rule absolute in terms of prayer clause (A).

(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) (B. P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)