← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/13024/2016disposed off

Sou. Kirti Rahul Gaikwad (Nee Kirti Arun Wable) v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS.

2016-11-22Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prakash D. Naik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Shantanu S. Kemkar2 pages

rpa 1/2 wp-13024-16.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 13024 OF 2016 Kirti R. Gaikwad (nee Kirti Arun Wable) .. Petitioner V/s.

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

.. Respondents ......

Mr. Prashant Bhavake, Advocate for the Petitioner. Ms. Nisha Mehra, AGP for the Respondent-State. ......

CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR AND PRAKASH D. NAIK, JJ.

DATED :

NOVEMBER 22, 2016.

P.C. :

Not on Board. Mentioned, taken on Board.

Having heard the learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner and the learned AGP for the Respondent-State, we are of the opinion that this petition can be conveniently disposed of by directing Respondent No. 5-Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Nashik to decide the representation/proposal dated 16th September, 2010 filed by Respondent No. 7 (Copy of which is annexed at page 40 to 45 to the Petition) which is received in the office of Respondent No. 5 Education Officer on 16th September, 2010, if not already decided, as expeditiously as

rpa 2/2 wp-13024-16.doc possible, and within the period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the order.

Till the Petitioner's claim is decided, the Respondent - State is directed to maintain the status-quo as it exists today in respect of the post occupied by the Petitioner. The Petition stands disposed of accordingly.

(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) (SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.)