Om Jagdish Bahel v. The State Of Maharashtra

(35)-CA-44-16.doc.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.44 OF 2015 IN LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.41 OF 2014 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2150 OF 2009 Mr. Om Jagdish Behl ..Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others ..Respondents AND Mr. Parvez Akhtar Sadees Ahmed and another ..Respondents Shri. Prashant Phophale a/w Shri. Chaitanya Jadhav i/by PMH Law for the Applicant.

Ms. Shakuntala A. Mudbidri for the Respondents. CORAM : R. M. SAVANT & SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, JJ DATE : 11th JULY, 2017 P.C.

By an order passed today in Civil Application No.156 of 2017, the heirs of the Applicant/Appellant No.1 are brought on record. The above Civil Application has been filed for restoration of the above Letters Patent Appeal which has stood dismissed for non-prosecution. The reasons why the advocate could not remain present on the said day when the Letters Patent Appeal was dismissed have been mentioned in the Civil Application.

BGP.

(35)-CA-44-16.doc.

The Learned Counsel Ms. Shakuntala A. Mudbidri appearing for the Respondents submits to the orders of the Court. Considering the reasons mentioned in the Civil Application, the same is allowed. The Letters Patent Appeal is restored to file. List the Letters Patent Appeal for admission on 03.08.2017. The above Civil Application is accordingly disposed of.

[SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J] [R.M.SAVANT, J] BGP.