Mrs. Shobha Mohan Kabugade Nee Ms. Shobha Honmane v. The Dy. Director Of Education (Secondary), Gr. Mumbai And ORS

(2) WP 153-16

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Amk WRIT PETITION NO. 153 OF 2016 Mrs. Shobha Mohan Kabugade Nee Ms. Shobha Honmane .. Petitioner Vs.

The Dy. Director of Education (Secondary), Gr. Mumbai & Ors.

.. Respondents Mr. Sunil Dighe for the Petitioner.

Mr. M. M. Pabale, AGP for the Respondents-State CORAM : PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, C.J. & N. M. JAMDAR, J.

DATE : 27 th JUNE, 2019.

P. C. :

1.

Learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that since issues of facts concerning Petitioner's grievance against the 4th Respondent arise, it would be advisable that the Petition is disposed of issuing a direction to the 1st Respondent to grant a hearing to the Petitioner as also the authorized representative of the school in which the Petitioner works; to call for the relevant records from the school and after permitting the Petitioner to file further documents pass necessary orders. 2.

A perusal of the Writ Petition would show that the grievance of the Petitioner is of not being paid wages as per scale applicable; obtaining her signatures on vouchers showing more amount paid; make her perform duties not related to the job of peon etc. 1/2

(2) WP 153-16 3.

Learned Counsel who appears for Respondent Nos.1, 2 & 4 states that the Petition may be disposed of in terms of prayer made by the learned Counsel for the Petitioner today.

4.

The Petition is disposed of directing the 1st Respondent to treat the instant Writ Petition together with its annexures as a representation. Within four weeks from today the 1st Respondent would notify to the Petitioner and the 4th Respondent a date for personal hearing. On said date a preliminary hearing would be held and such record which Respondent No.4 needs to be produced would be specified. A date would be fixed for further hearing on that date the 4th Respondent would produce the record which would be considered along with such documents on which the Petitioner places reliance upon. Thereafter decision would be taken within six months from today. Needless to state, the decision would be enforced.

[N. M. JAMDAR, J.] [CHIEF JUSTICE] 2/2